Comments for Bang the Table

Comment on Twitter Guidelines by tweet adder crack

tweet adder crack — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:29:57 +0000

certainly like your website however you have to test the spelling on several of your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling problems and I to find it very troublesome to inform the reality on the other hand I’ll certainly come again again.

Comment on Introducing Bang the Table's Three Phase Moderation by Online community engagement: Transparency vs. Anonymity « Bang the Table

Online community engagement: Transparency vs. Anonymity « Bang the Table — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:10:38 +0000

[...] But we are also very conscious of the dark side of web anonymity (slander, bullying etc) and put measures in place to combat this [...]

Comment on Online community engagement: Transparency vs. Anonymity by Tracey Gobey

Tracey Gobey — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:04:14 +0000

Hi Megan. Thanks for adding your voice to this conversation. You make an excellent point about the need to have some transparency when it comes to CE provider and participant. Best of both worlds is always nice!

Comment on Online community engagement: Transparency vs. Anonymity by Megan

Megan — Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:02:56 +0000

One more thought: maybe the transparency should be between the participant and the CE provider and the anonymity should be whatever is “public” – that way you get the best of both.

Comment on Online community engagement: Transparency vs. Anonymity by Megan

Megan — Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:58:53 +0000

Tricky one. Ideally, I’d say transparency all the way. It would certainly prevent those people who post comments under multiple pseudonyms in the hope of ‘swaying’ an outcome and also seem far more democratic an approach. Also it means that where needed, we can drill down further into the conversation to truly understand motivations and needs. This also allows us the scope to better engage and build a stronger relationship with our community members.

However, to provide this I’d suggest we need to change the environment we operate in, some of which is out of our control. It needs be safe, free from bullying and victimisation and, as you say, repercussion. Also we need to somehow evolve the conversation from sides to finding middle ground. Right now I observe too much right vs wrong debate and people getting so worked up when 1) others don’t see things the way they do (therefore the process must be flawed) or 2) they don’t get what they want (therefore the system is corrupt). As I said tricky – but a great conversation

Comment on New “conditional” survey questions by Crispin Butteriss

Crispin Butteriss — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 02:54:46 +0000

Thanks Dan. Our hard working dev team will be very grateful for the feedback.

Comment on New “conditional” survey questions by Dan Popping

Dan Popping — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 02:47:07 +0000

Hi BTT team. I just love the sound of these new survey questions and functionality.
Cant wait to try them out !!
Keep up the great work

Comment on Twitter Guidelines by internet marketing

internet marketing — Sun, 01 Jan 2012 08:13:18 +0000

Wonderful paintings! That is the kind of info that should be shared around the web. Disgrace on Google for now not positioning this post higher! Come on over and visit my site . Thanks =)

Comment on Twitter Guidelines by VlcMad

VlcMad — Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:39:56 +0000

genial articulo! la informaci�n que hay en la blog me ha servido de gran ayuda! Saludos y a�ado el blog a mis favoritos

Comment on Advantages & disadvantages of online communication by Azimeh

Azimeh — Tue, 20 Dec 2011 05:32:03 +0000

thank you for your useful imformation