<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://corporate.bangthetable.com/2009/04/19/media-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://corporate.bangthetable.com/2009/04/19/media-watch/</link>
	<description>Engaging your community online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 03:09:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dean</title>
		<link>http://corporate.bangthetable.com/2009/04/19/media-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress-blogger.dev/?p=93#comment-45</guid>
		<description>my kids at an ABC center. The people are great. Social Media is not the place for pro or con. It&#039;s a monumental balls-up, and most of the parents are already in a network (or at work). Silly SMH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my kids at an ABC center. The people are great. Social Media is not the place for pro or con. It&#8217;s a monumental balls-up, and most of the parents are already in a network (or at work). Silly SMH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nextbrett</title>
		<link>http://corporate.bangthetable.com/2009/04/19/media-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>nextbrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress-blogger.dev/?p=93#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Great article, good coverage. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SMH are trying beat up a new angle on an story that&#039;s seen many cycles. It&#039;s great to see ABC airing out its laundry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, good coverage. </p>
<p>SMH are trying beat up a new angle on an story that&#8217;s seen many cycles. It&#8217;s great to see ABC airing out its laundry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Bush</title>
		<link>http://corporate.bangthetable.com/2009/04/19/media-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 02:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress-blogger.dev/?p=93#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You are spot on here. I am part of the team at DP Dialogue who worked with ABC to develop the site. We believe this article was way out of line. Not only were ABC given no right of reply, the insinuation that ABC told forum members to write positive reviews is incorrect. We did approach some parents who we have had previous contact with to start the conversation about their childcare experiences (the good and the bad). However, in no way did we tell them what to say or how to say it. We are keeping this forum open and honest (as you can no doubt already tell with a diverse range of opinions). All this could have been clarified with a call to ABC&#039;s PR representative for a more balanced and informed article. Good work on questioning it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Nathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt</p>
<p>You are spot on here. I am part of the team at DP Dialogue who worked with ABC to develop the site. We believe this article was way out of line. Not only were ABC given no right of reply, the insinuation that ABC told forum members to write positive reviews is incorrect. We did approach some parents who we have had previous contact with to start the conversation about their childcare experiences (the good and the bad). However, in no way did we tell them what to say or how to say it. We are keeping this forum open and honest (as you can no doubt already tell with a diverse range of opinions). All this could have been clarified with a call to ABC&#8217;s PR representative for a more balanced and informed article. Good work on questioning it. </p>
<p>Regards,<br />Nathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
